Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

All Data

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Clark

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adults 65+ Immunized for Influenza

Current Value:
55.7%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (54.3%), Clark has a value of 55.7% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(54.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (55.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (54.6%).
Prior Value
(54.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults 65+ Immunized for Pneumonia

Current Value:
68.8%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (70.1%), Clark has a value of 68.8% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(70.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (68.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (68.5%).
Prior Value
(68.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia

14.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 14.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,449 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (14.3), Clark has a value of 14.1 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(14.3)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.4), Clark has a value of 14.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (14.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (16.1).
Prior Value
(16.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Community Acquired Pneumonia

22.9
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 22.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 29.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.4.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 14 counties.
Compared to the NV Value (24.7), Clark has a value of 22.9 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(24.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Hepatitis

1.6
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (1.7), Clark has a value of 1.6 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Immunization-Preventable Pneumonia and Influenza

0.8
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (1.0), Clark has a value of 0.8 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(1.0)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate

Current Value:
0.1
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 0.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.4.
NV Counties
(Feb 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 0.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.3.
U.S. Counties
(Mar 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,811 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (0.4), Clark has a value of 0.1 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(0.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.7), Clark has a value of 0.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (0.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (0.9).
Prior Value
(0.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate

Current Value:
5.21
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 5.21 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.21 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.36.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 5.21 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.84 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.01.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (4.40), Clark has a value of 5.21 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(4.40)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.97), Clark has a value of 5.21 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (5.21) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4.65).
Prior Value
(4.65)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
39.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 39.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 29.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 18.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 39.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (41.0%), Clark has a value of 39.0% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(41.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Clark has a value of 39.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (39.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (38.0%).
Prior Value
(38.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19

Current Value:
60.8%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 60.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 44.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.4%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 60.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 52.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (60.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (60.8%).
Prior Value
(60.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 4.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 2.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (7.0%), Clark has a value of 6.0% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Clark has a value of 6.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (6.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (4.0%).
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Babies with Low Birthweight

Current Value:
8.9%
(2015-2017)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 8.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to the NV Value (8.7%), Clark has a value of 8.9% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(8.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.2%), Clark has a value of 8.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Clark (8.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.4%).
Prior Value
(8.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Infant Mortality Rate

Current Value:

County: Clark Infant Mortality Rate

5.2
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (5.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.5).
Prior Value
(5.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Clark Neonatal Mortality Rate

Current Value:

County: Clark Neonatal Mortality Rate

3.2
Per 1,000 live births
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (3.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.3).
Prior Value
(3.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Postneonatal Mortality Rate

Current Value:
2.5
Per 1,000 live births
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (2.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.5).
Prior Value
(2.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adolescent Suicidal Ideation

Current Value:
15.9%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (15.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.5%).
Prior Value
(17.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adolescents Treated for Suicide Injuries

Current Value:
2.4%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (2.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.1%).
Prior Value
(3.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adolescents Who Attempted Suicide

Current Value:
8.2%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (8.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.2%).
Prior Value
(9.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adolescents Who Planned about Committing Suicide

13.8%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (13.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.6%).
Prior Value
(15.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

Current Value:
19.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 19.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.9%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 19.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (20.7%), Clark has a value of 19.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(20.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide

Current Value:
18.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 18.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,307 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (19.6), Clark has a value of 18.0 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(19.6)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.9), Clark has a value of 18.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (18.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.0).
Prior Value
(19.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Clark Depression: Medicare Population

Current Value:
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 13.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (13.0%), Clark has a value of 13.0%.
NV Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Clark has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (13.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Frequent Mental Distress

Current Value:

County: Clark Frequent Mental Distress

14.4%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 14.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 14.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (15.2%), Clark has a value of 14.4% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(15.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Clark has a value of 14.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (14.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.9%).
Prior Value
(13.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Mental Health Provider Rate

Current Value:
240
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 240 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 147 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 94.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 240 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 137 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 62.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,956 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (251), Clark has a value of 240 which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(251)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (240) is greater and better than the previously measured value (230).
Prior Value
(230)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:
16.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 16.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.1%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 16.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (15.8%), Clark has a value of 16.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Poor Mental Health: Average Number of Days

Current Value:
5.5
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 5.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 5.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (5.5), Clark has a value of 5.5.
NV Value
(5.5)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.8), Clark has a value of 5.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(4.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (5.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.1).
Prior Value
(5.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Prevalence of Adult Depression

Current Value:
16.6%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (16.6%), Clark has a value of 16.6%.
NV Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (16.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.6%).
Prior Value
(15.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Child Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Clark Child Death Rate

15.5
Deaths per 100,000 children ages 1-14
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (16.1), Clark has a value of 15.5 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(16.1)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (15.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.8).
Prior Value
(12.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Life Expectancy

Current Value:

County: Clark Life Expectancy

77.2
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 77.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 77.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (77.0), Clark has a value of 77.2 which is higher and better.
NV Value
(77.0)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (77.6), Clark has a value of 77.2 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Premature Death

Current Value:

County: Clark Premature Death

8,192.6
Years per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 8,192.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9,469.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11,769.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,886 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (8,316.9), Clark has a value of 8,192.6 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(8,316.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (7,971.5), Clark has a value of 8,192.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7,971.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Teen Death Rate

Current Value:

County: Clark Teen Death Rate

43.4
Deaths per 100,000 teens ages 15-19
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (45.3), Clark has a value of 43.4 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(45.3)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (43.4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (42.0).
Prior Value
(42.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adults Who Eat Fruit Less Than Once Per Day

Current Value:
37.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (41.9%), Clark has a value of 37.5% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(41.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (37.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (39.8%).
Prior Value
(39.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Adults Who Eat Vegetables Less than Once Per Day

22.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (24.1%), Clark has a value of 22.7% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(24.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (22.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.1%).
Prior Value
(23.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Fruit Intake among Adolescents

Current Value:
80.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (80.0%), Clark has a value of 80.7% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (80.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (78.5%).
Prior Value
(78.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Fruit Intake among Adults

Current Value:
40.2%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (36.9%), Clark has a value of 40.2% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(36.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (40.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36.5%).
Prior Value
(36.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Milk Intake among Adolescents

Current Value:
93.9%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (93.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (92.4%).
Prior Value
(92.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Sugary Drink Intake among Adolescents

Current Value:
13.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (14.0%), Clark has a value of 13.3% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (13.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.4%).
Prior Value
(11.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Vegetable Intake among Adolescents

Current Value:
92.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (91.9%), Clark has a value of 92.3% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(91.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (92.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (95.2%).
Prior Value
(95.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Vegetable Intake among Adults

Current Value:
19.5%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (19.2%), Clark has a value of 19.5% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(19.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (19.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.3%).
Prior Value
(22.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

31.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 31.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 30.1%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 31.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (37.9%), Clark has a value of 31.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

47.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 47.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 38.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 37.4%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 47.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 42.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 39.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (43.7%), Clark has a value of 47.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:
34.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (34.0%), Clark has a value of 34.1%.
NV Value
(34.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Clark has a value of 34.1%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
13.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (14.3%), Clark has a value of 13.8%.
NV Value
(14.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Clark has a value of 13.8%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
8.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (7.5%), Clark has a value of 8.0%.
NV Value
(7.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Clark has a value of 8.0%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
6.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (6.6%), Clark has a value of 6.8%.
NV Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Clark has a value of 6.8%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

13.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (12.9%), Clark has a value of 13.4%.
NV Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Clark has a value of 13.4%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease

27.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 27.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (24.7), Clark has a value of 27.3 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(24.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (31.0), Clark has a value of 27.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(31.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (27.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.2).
Prior Value
(25.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 5.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
(2021)
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (5.0%), Clark has a value of 5.0%.
NV Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Clark has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:
11.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 11.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 11.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (12.2%), Clark has a value of 11.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Adults who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:
57.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 57.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 57.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (63.9%), Clark has a value of 57.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(63.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Dentist Rate

Current Value:

County: Clark Dentist Rate

67
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 67 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 23.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 67 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 27.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,054 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (66), Clark has a value of 67 which is higher and better.
NV Value
(66)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (67) is greater and better than the previously measured value (65).
Prior Value
(65)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adults with Arthritis

Current Value:

County: Clark Adults with Arthritis

25.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 25.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 25.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (26.6%), Clark has a value of 25.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Adults with Kidney Disease

Current Value:
3.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 3.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 3.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.1%), Clark has a value of 3.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Kidney Disease

Current Value:
8.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 8.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,416 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (8.8), Clark has a value of 8.0 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(8.8)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.8), Clark has a value of 8.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (8.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.1).
Prior Value
(8.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Dehydration

11.8
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 11.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.4.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 12 counties.
Compared to the NV Value (11.1), Clark has a value of 11.8 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(11.1)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Urinary Tract Infections

15.3
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 15.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.8.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 13 counties.
Compared to the NV Value (15.7), Clark has a value of 15.3 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(15.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
19.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 19.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 19.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (17.0%), Clark has a value of 19.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Clark has a value of 19.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (19.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.0%).
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Current Value:
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 10.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 10.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (10.0%), Clark has a value of 10.0%.
NV Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Clark has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (10.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

32.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 32.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 29.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 32.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (31.0%), Clark has a value of 32.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(31.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Clark has a value of 32.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (32.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (31.0%).
Prior Value
(31.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adults who are Physically Active

Current Value:
73.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (73.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (72.9%).
Prior Value
(72.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults who are Sedentary

Current Value:

County: Clark Adults who are Sedentary

27.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (27.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.2%).
Prior Value
(24.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

County: Clark Physical Activity among Adolescents

Current Value:
39.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (41.3%), Clark has a value of 39.0% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(41.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (39.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (35.1%).
Prior Value
(35.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Physical Inactivity among Adolescents

Current Value:
16.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (16.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.2%).
Prior Value
(18.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education

Current Value:
15.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (15.9%), Clark has a value of 15.1% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (15.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.0%).
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Television Exposure among Adolescents

Current Value:
23.3%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (23.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (30.8%).
Prior Value
(30.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Video/Computer Game Habits

Current Value:
40.2%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (40.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (38.9%).
Prior Value
(38.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms

Current Value:
15.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 15.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,083 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (15.9), Clark has a value of 15.1 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(15.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0), Clark has a value of 15.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (15.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.2).
Prior Value
(15.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries

44.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 44.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 72.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,454 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (48.7), Clark has a value of 44.3 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(48.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (51.6), Clark has a value of 44.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(51.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (44.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (42.6).
Prior Value
(42.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.2), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Mortality Rate due to Heat-Related Illness

5.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (5.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.0).
Prior Value
(4.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Rate of Emergency Department Visits due to Heat-Related Illness

3.2
ED visits per 10,000 population
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (3.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.1).
Prior Value
(3.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Rode with a Driver Who Had Been Drinking Alcohol

17.2%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (17.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.3%).
Prior Value
(21.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Seat Belt Use among Adults

Current Value:
90.0%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (89.3%), Clark has a value of 90.0% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(89.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (90.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (89.5%).
Prior Value
(89.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adult Asthma History

Current Value:

County: Clark Adult Asthma History

12.4%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (13.6%), Clark has a value of 12.4% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (12.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.4%).
Prior Value
(12.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults Who Currently Have Asthma

Current Value:
6.8%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (8.1%), Clark has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (6.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.1%).
Prior Value
(8.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults with COPD

Current Value:

County: Clark Adults with COPD

7.0%
Percent of adults
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.3%).
Prior Value
(7.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults with Current Asthma

Current Value:
10.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 10.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.2%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 10.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (9.9%), Clark has a value of 10.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases

44.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 44.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 50.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,518 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (47.1), Clark has a value of 44.7 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(47.1)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (38.1), Clark has a value of 44.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(38.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (44.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (46.7).
Prior Value
(46.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Adult Asthma

7.9
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 7.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.9.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 10 counties.
Compared to the NV Value (7.3), Clark has a value of 7.9 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(7.3)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Asthma

8.8
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 8.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 10 counties.
Compared to the NV Value (8.1), Clark has a value of 8.8 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(8.1)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to COPD

Current Value:
18.3
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 18.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.8.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 14 counties.
Compared to the NV Value (18.6), Clark has a value of 18.3 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(18.6)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Pediatric Asthma

11.3
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population under 18 years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (10.4), Clark has a value of 11.3 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(10.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark Asthma: Medicare Population

Current Value:
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (7.0%), Clark has a value of 7.0%.
NV Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Clark has a value of 7.0%.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark COPD: Medicare Population

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (11.0%), Clark has a value of 11.0%.
NV Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Clark has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Chlamydia Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Clark Chlamydia Incidence Rate

550.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 550.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 261.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 350.8.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 550.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 294.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 467.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (509.4), Clark has a value of 550.6 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(509.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (495.0), Clark has a value of 550.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(495.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (550.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (563.8).
Prior Value
(563.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Clark Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

129.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (113.0), Clark has a value of 129.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(113.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Clark (129.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (94.1).
Prior Value
(94.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark HIV Diagnosis Rate

Current Value:

County: Clark HIV Diagnosis Rate

20.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2014-2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (20.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.8).
Prior Value
(17.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Persons Living with HIV Rate

Current Value:
418.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2014-2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (418.4) is greater  than the previously measured value (374.0).
Prior Value
(374.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Syphilis Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Clark Syphilis Incidence Rate

11.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.4), Clark has a value of 11.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Clark (11.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.0).
Prior Value
(6.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adolescents Who Currently Smoke Cigarettes

Current Value:
5.4%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (5.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.9%).
Prior Value
(5.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adolescents Who Currently Use Smokeless Tobacco

3.1%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (3.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.0%).
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adolescents Who Frequently Smoke Cigarettes

Current Value:
0.9%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (0.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.2%).
Prior Value
(1.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adolescents Who Smoked before Age 13

Current Value:
5.7%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (5.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adult Smoking Cessation

Current Value:

County: Clark Adult Smoking Cessation

42.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (42.3%), Clark has a value of 42.5% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(42.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (42.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (56.5%).
Prior Value
(56.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults who Smoke

Current Value:

County: Clark Adults who Smoke

15.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 15.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.9%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 15.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Clark has a value of 15.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Clark Adults Who Use Chewing Tobacco

Current Value:
0.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (1.2%), Clark has a value of 0.7% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (0.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.0%).
Prior Value
(1.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults Who Use E-Cigarettes or Other Vaping Products

6.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (7.0%), Clark has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark Teens Who Bought Their Own E-vape Products

Current Value:
1.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (2.3%), Clark has a value of 1.0% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (1.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.7%).
Prior Value
(5.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Teens Who Currently Smoke Cigars

Current Value:
6.2%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (6.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.7%).
Prior Value
(5.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Teens Who Used an E-vape for Marijuana

Current Value:
15.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (16.0%), Clark has a value of 15.7% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark Teens Who Used an E-vape for Nicotine

Current Value:
12.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (15.0%), Clark has a value of 12.5% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adolescents with Obesity

Current Value:

County: Clark Adolescents with Obesity

16.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (16.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adolescents with Overweight

Current Value:
17.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (17.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.9%).
Prior Value
(15.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults with Obesity

Current Value:

County: Clark Adults with Obesity

31.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (31.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (29.2%).
Prior Value
(29.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Frequent Physical Distress

Current Value:
13.5%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 13.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 13.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (13.4%), Clark has a value of 13.5% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Clark has a value of 13.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (13.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:

County: Clark Insufficient Sleep

40.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 40.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 40.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (36.0%), Clark has a value of 40.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (26.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)

County: Clark Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:
14.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 14.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.1%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 14.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (12.7%), Clark has a value of 14.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Poor Physical Health: Average Number of Days

Current Value:
4.3
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 4.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.7.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 4.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (4.1), Clark has a value of 4.3 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(4.1)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.3), Clark has a value of 4.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (4.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.8).
Prior Value
(3.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

21.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 21.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 21.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (17.9%), Clark has a value of 21.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(17.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark

Community / Civic Engagement

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Community / Civic Engagement

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Voter Turnout: Presidential Election

Current Value:
75.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 75.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 77.6%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to the NV Value (78.2%), Clark has a value of 75.7% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (75.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (74.7%).
Prior Value
(74.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (58.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(58.4%)
<div>SDOH-07: Increase the proportion of the voting-age citizens who vote</div>

County: Clark

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide

Current Value:
7.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 7.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 495 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (6.8), Clark has a value of 7.4 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(6.8)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6), Clark has a value of 7.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (7.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.7).
Prior Value
(7.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.5), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
<div>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Clark Juvenile Arrests

Current Value:

County: Clark Juvenile Arrests

6,989
Arrests
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (6,989) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5,452).
Prior Value
(5,452)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Violent Crime Rate

Current Value:

County: Clark Violent Crime Rate

4,917.9
Crimes per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 4,917.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,285.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,722.5.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to the NV Value (4,648.8), Clark has a value of 4,917.9 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(4,648.8)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (4,917.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (470.0).
Prior Value
(470.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Average Household Size

Current Value:

County: Clark Average Household Size

2.70
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (2.60), Clark has a value of 2.70.
NV Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.60), Clark has a value of 2.70.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

County: Clark Foreign Born Persons

21.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (19.1%), Clark has a value of 21.8%.
NV Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Clark has a value of 21.8%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Population Over Age 65 (Count)

Current Value:
343,754
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Residential Segregation - Black/White

Current Value:
38.7
Score
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 38.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 50.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,076 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (49.1), Clark has a value of 38.7 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(49.1)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (62.7), Clark has a value of 38.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(62.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (38.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (38.8).
Prior Value
(38.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Veteran Population

Current Value:

County: Clark Veteran Population

8.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (8.5%), Clark has a value of 8.1%.
NV Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Clark has a value of 8.1%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions

9.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 9.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,266 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (10.3), Clark has a value of 9.0 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(10.3)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.4), Clark has a value of 9.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (9.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.3).
Prior Value
(9.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)

County: Clark Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Current Value:
27.9%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 27.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 27.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,116 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (27.6%), Clark has a value of 27.9% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(27.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Clark has a value of 27.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (27.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.7%).
Prior Value
(25.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Children in Single-Parent Households

Current Value:
29.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 29.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 29.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (27.8%), Clark has a value of 29.3% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Clark has a value of 29.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Linguistic Isolation

Current Value:

County: Clark Linguistic Isolation

6.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 6.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.0%.
NV Counties
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 6.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,252 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (5.3%), Clark has a value of 6.5% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.2%), Clark has a value of 6.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark People 65+ Living Alone

Current Value:

County: Clark People 65+ Living Alone

24.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.6%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (24.3%), Clark has a value of 24.0% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(24.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.4%), Clark has a value of 24.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Current Value:
82,341
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Social Associations

Current Value:

County: Clark Social Associations

3.5
Membership associations per 10,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 3.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 5.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 3.1.
NV Counties
(2016)
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 3.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 10.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (4.3), Clark has a value of 3.5 which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(4.3)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (9.1), Clark has a value of 3.5 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(9.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (3.5) is greater and better than the previously measured value (3.4).
Prior Value
(3.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Households without a Vehicle

Current Value:
7.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (7.1%), Clark has a value of 7.7%.
NV Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Clark has a value of 7.7%.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

County: Clark Mean Travel Time to Work

25.1
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 25.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.2.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 25.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (24.7), Clark has a value of 25.1 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(24.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Clark has a value of 25.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Solo Drivers with a Long Commute

Current Value:
34.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 34.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 34.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (32.1%), Clark has a value of 34.2% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Clark has a value of 34.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (34.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (33.9%).
Prior Value
(33.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
2.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 2.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 1.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to the NV Value (2.5%), Clark has a value of 2.5%.
NV Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Clark has a value of 2.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

County: Clark Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Current Value:
74.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 74.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 73.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 75.8%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 74.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (73.6%), Clark has a value of 74.2% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Clark has a value of 74.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Workers who Walk to Work

Current Value:

County: Clark Workers who Walk to Work

1.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 1.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 2.1%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 1.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (1.5%), Clark has a value of 1.2% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Clark has a value of 1.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Economy / Employment

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Economy / Employment

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Children whose Parents Lack Secure Employment

Current Value:
7.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (6.9%), Clark has a value of 7.8% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(6.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (7.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2.6%).
Prior Value
(2.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Employer Establishments

Current Value:

County: Clark Employer Establishments

53,591
Number of Establishments
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (53,591) is greater  than the previously measured value (51,465).
Prior Value
(51,465)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
58.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 58.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 52.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 42.2%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 58.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (58.3%), Clark has a value of 58.7% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(58.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (58.5%), Clark has a value of 58.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
58.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 58.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 50.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.9%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 58.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (58.4%), Clark has a value of 58.4%.
NV Value
(58.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (59.6%), Clark has a value of 58.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Size of Labor Force

Current Value:

County: Clark Size of Labor Force

1,201,461
Persons
(August 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (1,201,461) is less and worse than the previously measured value (1,209,806).
Prior Value
(1,209,806)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Total Employment

Current Value:

County: Clark Total Employment

917,211
Paid Employees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (917,211) is greater  than the previously measured value (813,652).
Prior Value
(813,652)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Total Employment Change

Current Value:

County: Clark Total Employment Change

12.7%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 12.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 4.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.2%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 12.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (11.1%), Clark has a value of 12.7% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(11.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.8%), Clark has a value of 12.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (12.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (-11.8%).
Prior Value
(-11.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Unemployed Veterans

Current Value:

County: Clark Unemployed Veterans

4.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 4.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 4.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,128 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (3.9%), Clark has a value of 4.1% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(3.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.2%), Clark has a value of 4.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
6.1%
(August 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 6.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.9%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 6.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on non-seasonally-adjusted data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (5.8%), Clark has a value of 6.1% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.4%), Clark has a value of 6.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (6.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.7%).
Prior Value
(6.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
22.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 22.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.9%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 22.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (20.9%), Clark has a value of 22.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(20.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.5%), Clark has a value of 22.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (22.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (17.8%).
Prior Value
(17.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Food Insecure Children Likely Ineligible for Assistance

35%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 35% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 35% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (36%), Clark has a value of 35% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(36%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (25%), Clark has a value of 35% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(25% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (35%) is less and better than the previously measured value (36%).
Prior Value
(36%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Clark Food Insecurity Rate

14.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 14.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 14.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (14.4%), Clark has a value of 14.6% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Clark has a value of 14.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (14.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Current Value:
49.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (48.4%), Clark has a value of 49.9%.
NV Value
(48.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Clark has a value of 49.9%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count)

52,582
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
25.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 25.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 25.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (23.0%), Clark has a value of 25.3% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (25.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (33.4%).
Prior Value
(33.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Projected Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
16.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 16.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 16.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (15.2%), Clark has a value of 16.3% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(15.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (16.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (20.4%).
Prior Value
(20.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program

Current Value:
87.4%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 87.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 85.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 87.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 47.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,710 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (79.0%), Clark has a value of 87.4% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(79.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (42.8%), Clark has a value of 87.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(42.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (87.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (75.3%).
Prior Value
(75.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Teens who Went Hungry due to Low Food Security

Current Value:
3.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (3.5%), Clark has a value of 3.4% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (3.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.7%).
Prior Value
(3.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark

Economy / Government Assistance

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Economy / Government Assistance

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Households with Cash Public Assistance Income

Current Value:
3.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 3.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.2%.
NV Counties
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 3.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,923 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (3.3%), Clark has a value of 3.7% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.7%), Clark has a value of 3.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Current Value:

County: Clark Homeowner Vacancy Rate

1.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 1.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 1.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (1.2%), Clark has a value of 1.3% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Clark has a value of 1.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.