Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

All Data

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Clark

Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adults who are Overweight

Current Value:
36.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (36.0%), Clark has a value of 36.2% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(36.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (36.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (35.4%).
Prior Value
(35.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate for Rx Opioid-Involved Overdoses

3.7
Per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (4.1), Clark has a value of 3.7 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(4.1 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (3.7) is less and worse than the previously measured value (4.3).
Prior Value
(4.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Fentanyl-Involved Overdose Death Rate

Current Value:
1.48
Per 100,000 population
(July 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (1.48) is less and worse than the previously measured value (1.70).
Prior Value
(1.70)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Health / Adolescent Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Adolescent Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Teens Who Bought Their Own Cigarettes

Current Value:
11.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (9.3%), Clark has a value of 11.3% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(9.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (11.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.9%).
Prior Value
(9.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Teens Who Have Ever Used Vaping Products

Current Value:
34.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (36.6%), Clark has a value of 34.3% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(36.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (34.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.5%).
Prior Value
(40.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adolescent Binge Drinking

Current Value:
14.0%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (14.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adolescent Cocaine Use

Current Value:

County: Clark Adolescent Cocaine Use

4.3%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (4.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.3%).
Prior Value
(5.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adolescent Illegal Injection-Drug Use

Current Value:
2.1%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (2.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.2%).
Prior Value
(2.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adolescents Who Currently Drink Alcohol

Current Value:
25.1%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (25.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (29.0%).
Prior Value
(29.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adolescents Who Currently Used Marijuana

Current Value:
19.2%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (19.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.6%).
Prior Value
(18.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adolescents Who Drank Alcohol before Age 13

Current Value:
17.9%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (17.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.3%).
Prior Value
(17.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adolescents Who Used Marijuana before Age 13

Current Value:
5.9%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (5.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.9%).
Prior Value
(7.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Clark Adults who Binge Drink

17.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 17.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 17.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (16.6%), Clark has a value of 17.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Adults who Drink Excessively

Current Value:
14.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 14.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 14.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (14.9%), Clark has a value of 14.1% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Clark has a value of 14.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (14.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (19.3%).
Prior Value
(19.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate for All Drug-Involved Overdoses

27.1
Per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (27.1) is greater and better than the previously measured value (24.7).
Prior Value
(24.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate for Heroin-Involved Overdoses

1.7
Per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (4.1), Clark has a value of 1.7 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(4.1 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (1.7) is less and worse than the previously measured value (2.6).
Prior Value
(2.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

21.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 21.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (22.4), Clark has a value of 21.6 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(22.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (23.5), Clark has a value of 21.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (21.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.3).
Prior Value
(23.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Alcohol Use

8.5
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 8.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.1.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 10 counties.
Compared to the NV Value (10.2), Clark has a value of 8.5 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(10.2)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin)

10.3
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (11.1), Clark has a value of 10.3 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(11.1)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (10.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.5).
Prior Value
(12.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Binge Drinking Prevalence

Current Value:
14.4%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (14.2%), Clark has a value of 14.4% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (14.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.6%).
Prior Value
(14.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Current Value:
25.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 25.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (25.9), Clark has a value of 25.0 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(25.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.2), Clark has a value of 25.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Clark Detected 6-Monoacetylmorphine

Current Value:
11
(Jul 15, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (11) is greater  than the previously measured value (5).
Prior Value
(5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Detected Acetaminophen

Current Value:

County: Clark Detected Acetaminophen

2
(Jul 15, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (2) is greater  than the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Detected Cocaine

Current Value:

County: Clark Detected Cocaine

2
(Jul 12, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (2) is less  than the previously measured value (4).
Prior Value
(4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Detected Fentanyl

Current Value:

County: Clark Detected Fentanyl

9
(Jul 15, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (9) is less  than the previously measured value (10).
Prior Value
(10)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Detected Heroin

Current Value:

County: Clark Detected Heroin

12
(Jul 15, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (12) is greater  than the previously measured value (9).
Prior Value
(9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Detected Methamphetamine

Current Value:

County: Clark Detected Methamphetamine

15
(Jul 15, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (15) is greater  than the previously measured value (2).
Prior Value
(2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Detected Noscapine

Current Value:

County: Clark Detected Noscapine

4
(Jul 15, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (4) is less  than the previously measured value (9).
Prior Value
(9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Detected Papaverine

Current Value:

County: Clark Detected Papaverine

9
(Jul 15, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (9) is greater  than the previously measured value (8).
Prior Value
(8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Detected Phenylephrine

Current Value:

County: Clark Detected Phenylephrine

12
(Jul 15, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (12) is greater  than the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Detected Quetiapine

Current Value:

County: Clark Detected Quetiapine

3
(Jul 15, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (3) is greater  than the previously measured value (2).
Prior Value
(2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Fentanyl Identified Among Paraphernalia Samples by Month

13.4%
Percent (%)
(October 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (13.4%) is greater  than the previously measured value (8.9%).
Prior Value
(8.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Heroin Identified Among Paraphernalia Samples by Month

57.8%
Percent (%)
(July 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (57.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (100.0%).
Prior Value
(100.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Illegal Drugs on School Property

Current Value:
29.0%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (29.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.1%).
Prior Value
(30.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Items Sampled

Current Value:

County: Clark Items Sampled

112
Units
(October 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (112) is less  than the previously measured value (348).
Prior Value
(348)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Methamphetamine Identified Among Paraphernalia Samples by Month

88.4%
Percent (%)
(October 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (88.4%) is greater  than the previously measured value (73.3%).
Prior Value
(73.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Methamphetamine-Involved Overdose Death Rate by Month

1.79
Per 100,000 population
(July 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (1.79) is less and worse than the previously measured value (2.05).
Prior Value
(2.05)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Methamphetamine-Involved Overdose Death Rate by Year

13.78
Per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (13.78) is greater and better than the previously measured value (12.12).
Prior Value
(12.12)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark No Compounds Detected

Current Value:

County: Clark No Compounds Detected

1
(Apr 29, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (1) is less  than the previously measured value (2).
Prior Value
(2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Non-Fatal Opioid Overdose Rate

Current Value:
1.09
Per 100,000 population
(July 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (1.09) is less and worse than the previously measured value (1.27).
Prior Value
(1.27)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

Current Value:
1.88
100,000 population
(July 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (1.88) is less and worse than the previously measured value (1.96).
Prior Value
(1.96)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Sample Not Tested

Current Value:

County: Clark Sample Not Tested

1
(Apr 29, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (1) is less  than the previously measured value (3).
Prior Value
(3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adults with Cancer

Current Value:

County: Clark Adults with Cancer

6.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 6.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.2%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 6.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Clark has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Adults with Cancer (Non-Skin) or Melanoma

Current Value:
6.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 6.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 6.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (8.2%), Clark has a value of 6.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Brain Cancer

Current Value:
3.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (3.9), Clark has a value of 3.5 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(3.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.4), Clark has a value of 3.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (3.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.2).
Prior Value
(4.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer

Current Value:
22.3
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 22.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,778 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (21.7), Clark has a value of 22.3 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(21.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.3), Clark has a value of 22.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (22.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.9).
Prior Value
(21.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (15.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer

Current Value:
147.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 147.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 162.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 179.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,080 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (146.0), Clark has a value of 147.3 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(146.0)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (146.0), Clark has a value of 147.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(146.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (147.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (150.8).
Prior Value
(150.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cervical Cancer

Current Value:
2.7
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (2.6), Clark has a value of 2.7 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(2.6)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.2), Clark has a value of 2.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (2.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.5).
Prior Value
(2.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Childhood Cancer

1.6
Deaths per 100,000 population 0-19
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 1.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1.
U.S. Counties
(2005-2009)
The distribution is based on data from 136 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (2.0), Clark has a value of 1.6 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(2.0)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.1), Clark has a value of 1.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (1.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.2).
Prior Value
(2.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer

14.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 14.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,180 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (13.7), Clark has a value of 14.1 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(13.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9), Clark has a value of 14.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (14.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.9).
Prior Value
(14.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Liver Cancer

Current Value:
6.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (6.6), Clark has a value of 6.8 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6), Clark has a value of 6.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (6.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.9).
Prior Value
(6.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer

Current Value:
32.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 32.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 48.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,746 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (31.2), Clark has a value of 32.3 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(31.2)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (32.4), Clark has a value of 32.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(32.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (32.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (36.0).
Prior Value
(36.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Melanoma

Current Value:
1.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 1.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 583 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (2.1), Clark has a value of 1.9 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(2.1)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.0), Clark has a value of 1.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (1.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.0).
Prior Value
(2.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Oral Cancer

Current Value:
2.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 2.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 758 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (2.8), Clark has a value of 2.7 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(2.8)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6), Clark has a value of 2.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (2.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.6).
Prior Value
(2.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Pancreatic Cancer

11.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 11.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,892 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (10.9), Clark has a value of 11.0 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(10.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.2), Clark has a value of 11.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (11.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.3).
Prior Value
(10.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer

Current Value:
20.7
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 20.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,612 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (20.4), Clark has a value of 20.7 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(20.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.0), Clark has a value of 20.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (20.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.3).
Prior Value
(19.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Uterine Cancer

Current Value:
4.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (4.3), Clark has a value of 4.6 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(4.3)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.2), Clark has a value of 4.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (4.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.4).
Prior Value
(4.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark All Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
372.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 372.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 374.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 438.6.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 372.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 459.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 492.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,931 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (388.3), Clark has a value of 372.0 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(388.3)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (444.4), Clark has a value of 372.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(444.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (372.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (385.8).
Prior Value
(385.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Bladder Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
16.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 16.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,187 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (18.1), Clark has a value of 16.9 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(18.1)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.8), Clark has a value of 16.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (16.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (18.9).
Prior Value
(18.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Brain Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
5.3
Per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (5.5), Clark has a value of 5.3 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(5.5)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.3), Clark has a value of 5.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (5.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.2).
Prior Value
(6.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
109.7
Cases per 100,000 females
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 109.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 125.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 137.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,712 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (113.0), Clark has a value of 109.7 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(113.0)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (129.8), Clark has a value of 109.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(129.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (109.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (111.1).
Prior Value
(111.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 11.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (10.0%), Clark has a value of 11.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Clark has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
8.2
Cases per 100,000 females
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 8.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 727 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (8.4), Clark has a value of 8.2 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(8.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.5), Clark has a value of 8.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (8.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.8).
Prior Value
(8.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Cervical Cancer Screening Prevalence

Current Value:
74.4%
(2014)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (73.1%), Clark has a value of 74.4% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (74.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (71.8%).
Prior Value
(71.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

Current Value:
78.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 78.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 78.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), Clark has a value of 78.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Childhood Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
17.9
Cases per 100,000 population 0-19
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 17.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 749 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (17.8), Clark has a value of 17.9 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(17.8)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.4), Clark has a value of 17.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (17.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.9).
Prior Value
(16.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Colon Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Clark Colon Cancer Screening

56.7%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 56.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 56.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), Clark has a value of 56.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Current Value:
56.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 56.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 61.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.9%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 56.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (66.3%), Clark has a value of 56.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
34.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 34.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 39.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,613 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (34.0), Clark has a value of 34.8 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(34.0)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.4), Clark has a value of 34.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (34.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36.1).
Prior Value
(36.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Colorectal Cancer Screening Prevalence

Current Value:
61.7%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (64.3%), Clark has a value of 61.7% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(64.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (61.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (63.5%).
Prior Value
(63.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Liver and Bile Duct Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
7.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 7.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,491 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (7.2), Clark has a value of 7.0 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(7.2)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.6), Clark has a value of 7.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (7.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0).
Prior Value
(7.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
44.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 44.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 62.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 73.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,711 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (44.7), Clark has a value of 44.3 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(44.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (53.1), Clark has a value of 44.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(53.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (44.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (51.1).
Prior Value
(51.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Current Value:
68.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 68.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 69.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 68.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (76.5%), Clark has a value of 68.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(76.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

County: Clark Mammography Screening Prevalence

Current Value:
72.7%
(2014)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (70.9%), Clark has a value of 72.7% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(70.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (72.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (75.3%).
Prior Value
(75.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Current Value:
34.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 34.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 32.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 24.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 34.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (38.0%), Clark has a value of 34.0% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(38.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Clark has a value of 34.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (34.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.0%).
Prior Value
(34.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Melanoma Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Clark Melanoma Incidence Rate

15.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 15.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,182 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (22.7), Clark has a value of 15.2 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(22.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.7), Clark has a value of 15.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(22.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (15.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.1).
Prior Value
(13.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Incidence Rate

Current Value:
14.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 14.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.0.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,077 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (14.6), Clark has a value of 14.1 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(14.6)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.5), Clark has a value of 14.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (14.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.9).
Prior Value
(14.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
9.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 9.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,869 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (10.4), Clark has a value of 9.3 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(10.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0), Clark has a value of 9.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (9.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.1).
Prior Value
(10.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Ovarian Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
10.6
Cases per 100,000 females
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 10.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 980 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (10.4), Clark has a value of 10.6 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(10.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.1), Clark has a value of 10.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (10.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.3).
Prior Value
(10.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Pancreatic Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
12.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 12.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,917 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (12.4), Clark has a value of 12.4.
NV Value
(12.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5), Clark has a value of 12.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (12.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.8).
Prior Value
(11.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
88.9
Cases per 100,000 males
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 88.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 110.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 127.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,728 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (94.1), Clark has a value of 88.9 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(94.1)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (113.2), Clark has a value of 88.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(113.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (88.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (79.9).
Prior Value
(79.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Uterine Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
24.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (23.7), Clark has a value of 24.3 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(23.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.8), Clark has a value of 24.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(27.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (24.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.5).
Prior Value
(22.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Health / Children's Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Children's Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Child Mortality Rate: Under 20

Current Value:
49.4
Deaths per 100,000 population under 20
(2018-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 49.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 76.0.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,859 U.S. counties and county equivalents. Counties in Idaho, Kentucky, and Oklahoma are excluded due to incomparable data between each other and the rest of the country.
Compared to the NV Value (51.4), Clark has a value of 49.4 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(51.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.6), Clark has a value of 49.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(50.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adults 20+ with Diabetes

Current Value:

County: Clark Adults 20+ with Diabetes

9.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 9.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.7%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 9.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (9.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults taking insulin

Current Value:

County: Clark Adults taking insulin

32.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (32.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.4%).
Prior Value
(30.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Adults tested for high blood sugar or diabetes in the past three years

57.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (57.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (52.4%).
Prior Value
(52.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults Who Have Been Told They Have Prediabetes

15.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (15.6%), Clark has a value of 15.5% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(15.6% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (15.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.5%).
Prior Value
(17.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults who have pre-diabetes or borderline diabetes

15.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (15.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.5%).
Prior Value
(17.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Adults Who Have Seen a Healthcare Provider for Diabetes

77.7%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (79.0%), Clark has a value of 77.7% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(79.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark Adults Who Have Taken a Diabetes Management Class

48.9%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (49.4%), Clark has a value of 48.9% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark Adults with Diabetes

Current Value:

County: Clark Adults with Diabetes

9.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (9.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.9%).
Prior Value
(11.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Current Value:
21.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 21.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,937 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (22.2), Clark has a value of 21.7 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(22.2)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.6), Clark has a value of 21.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(22.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (21.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (19.3).
Prior Value
(19.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes

22.4
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 22.4 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.0.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 14 counties.
Compared to the NV Value (21.0), Clark has a value of 22.4 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(21.0)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Long-Term Complications of Diabetes

11.0
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 11.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.3.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 12 counties.
Compared to the NV Value (9.9), Clark has a value of 11.0 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(9.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Short-Term Complications of Diabetes

9.6
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 9.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 12 counties.
Compared to the NV Value (9.6), Clark has a value of 9.6.
NV Value
(9.6)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Uncontrolled Diabetes

1.3
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (1.1), Clark has a value of 1.3 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(1.1)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:
25.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 25.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (23.0%), Clark has a value of 25.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Clark has a value of 25.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (25.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.0%).
Prior Value
(25.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population

Current Value:
80.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 80.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 79.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.9%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 80.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,097 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (81.2%), Clark has a value of 80.7% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(81.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (87.5%), Clark has a value of 80.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (80.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (80.0%).
Prior Value
(80.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Current Value:
22.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 22.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 22.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (22.2%), Clark has a value of 22.9% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(22.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Clark has a value of 22.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Children with a Disability

Current Value:
4.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (4.4%), Clark has a value of 4.3%.
NV Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Clark has a value of 4.3%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:
4.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (4.9%), Clark has a value of 4.8%.
NV Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Clark has a value of 4.8%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Persons with a Disability

Current Value:
12.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (12.9%), Clark has a value of 12.5%.
NV Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Clark has a value of 12.5%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
3.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (3.8%), Clark has a value of 3.4%.
NV Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Clark has a value of 3.4%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
2.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (2.5%), Clark has a value of 2.6%.
NV Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Clark has a value of 2.6%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
2.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (2.6%), Clark has a value of 2.5%.
NV Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Clark has a value of 2.5%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:
6.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (6.9%), Clark has a value of 6.8%.
NV Value
(6.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Clark has a value of 6.8%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Veterans with a Disability

Current Value:
29.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (30.5%), Clark has a value of 29.8%.
NV Value
(30.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (29.8%), Clark has a value of 29.8%.
US Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Health / Family Planning

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Family Planning

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Birth Rate

Current Value:

County: Clark Birth Rate

12.2
Per 1,000 population
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (12.2) is less  than the previously measured value (12.7).
Prior Value
(12.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Condom Use among Adolescents

Current Value:
56.5%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (56.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (58.3%).
Prior Value
(58.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark General Fertility Rate

Current Value:

County: Clark General Fertility Rate

60.3
Per 1,000 women aged 15–44
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (60.3) is less  than the previously measured value (62.4).
Prior Value
(62.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Teen Birth Rate: 15-19

Current Value:

County: Clark Teen Birth Rate: 15-19

11.9
Live births per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (11.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (21.9).
Prior Value
(21.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Current Value:
69.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 69.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.4%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 69.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 77.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (76.1%), Clark has a value of 69.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(76.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Adults Who Have Had A-one-C (A1C) Checked

Current Value:
75.7%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (79.3%), Clark has a value of 75.7% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(79.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark Adults with Health Insurance

Current Value:
84.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 84.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (84.7%), Clark has a value of 84.0% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(84.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.7%), Clark has a value of 84.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (84.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (83.0%).
Prior Value
(83.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults without Health Insurance

Current Value:
11.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 11.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.9%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 11.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Clark has a value of 11.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Children with Health Insurance

Current Value:
92.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 92.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 93.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (92.4%), Clark has a value of 92.2% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(92.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (94.9%), Clark has a value of 92.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(94.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (92.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (90.9%).
Prior Value
(90.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Medicare Healthcare Costs

Current Value:
$10,634
Dollars per enrollee
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value ($9,656), Clark has a value of $10,634.
NV Value
($9,656)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value ($9,729), Clark has a value of $10,634.
US Value
($9,729)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark ($10,634) is greater  than the previously measured value ($10,598).
Prior Value
($10,598)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
109
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 109 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 109 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (109), Clark has a value of 109.
NV Value
(109)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (109) is greater and better than the previously measured value (100).
Prior Value
(100)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:
86.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 86.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.8%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 86.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (86.8%), Clark has a value of 86.4% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(86.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (86.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (85.6%).
Prior Value
(85.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Clark Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
51.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (52.0%), Clark has a value of 51.0%.
NV Value
(52.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.8%), Clark has a value of 51.0%.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (51.0%) is greater  than the previously measured value (50.3%).
Prior Value
(50.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
26.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (25.5%), Clark has a value of 26.5%.
NV Value
(25.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8%), Clark has a value of 26.5%.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (26.5%) is less  than the previously measured value (26.7%).
Prior Value
(26.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

3,090
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 3,090 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,209 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2,703.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 3,090 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,375.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (2,788), Clark has a value of 3,090 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(2,788)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677), Clark has a value of 3,090 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2,677)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (3,090) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3,030).
Prior Value
(3,030)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
55
Providers per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 55 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 26.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 55 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 29.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,984 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (57), Clark has a value of 55 which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(57)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (55) is less and worse than the previously measured value (57).
Prior Value
(57)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Households with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
89.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 89.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.8%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 89.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (88.9%), Clark has a value of 89.0% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(88.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Clark has a value of 89.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

95.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 95.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 90.9%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 95.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (95.3%), Clark has a value of 95.5% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(95.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Clark has a value of 95.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
91.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 91.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 91.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (91.1%), Clark has a value of 91.1%.
NV Value
(91.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Clark has a value of 91.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adults taking hypertension medication

Current Value:
77.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (77.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (67.2%).
Prior Value
(67.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Adults Taking Prescription Cholesterol Medicine

23.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (24.3%), Clark has a value of 23.9% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(24.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark Adults who Experienced a Stroke

Current Value:
4.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (4.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.1%).
Prior Value
(3.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:
6.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 6.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 6.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.8%), Clark has a value of 6.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Adults who experienced Coronary Heart Disease or Myocardial Infarction

6.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (6.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.3%).
Prior Value
(5.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults Who Have Had a Heart Attack / Myocardial Infarction

3.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (3.8%), Clark has a value of 3.4% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (3.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.7%).
Prior Value
(4.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

75.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 75.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 75.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 77.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,066 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Clark has a value of 75.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)

35.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 35.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 39.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,338 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (38.3), Clark has a value of 35.7 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(38.3)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (37.6), Clark has a value of 35.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(37.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (35.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (35.8).
Prior Value
(35.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease

98.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 98.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 98.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 121.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (104.9), Clark has a value of 98.0 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(104.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (90.2), Clark has a value of 98.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (98.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (102.8).
Prior Value
(102.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (71.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack

Current Value:
41.0
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 41.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 41.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 65.2.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 41.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 61.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 87.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,101 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (30.6), Clark has a value of 41.0 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(30.6)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (41.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (37.0).
Prior Value
(37.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Failure

32.6
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 32.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.5.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 13 counties.
Compared to the NV Value (29.6), Clark has a value of 32.6 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(29.6)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Hypertension

5.9
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (5.4), Clark has a value of 5.9 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(5.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.

County: Clark Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Current Value:
12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (12.0%), Clark has a value of 12.0%.
NV Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Clark has a value of 12.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (12.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Cholesterol Screening Prevalence

Current Value:
73.8%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (74.7%), Clark has a value of 73.8% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(74.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (73.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (74.1%).
Prior Value
(74.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Clark Cholesterol Test History

Current Value:

County: Clark Cholesterol Test History

82.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 82.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 82.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,066 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (86.4%), Clark has a value of 82.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Current Value:
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (9.0%), Clark has a value of 10.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Clark has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (10.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark High Blood Pressure Prevalence

Current Value:
33.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 33.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.2%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 33.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,066 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (32.7%), Clark has a value of 33.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (41.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)

County: Clark High Cholesterol Prevalence

Current Value:
36.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 36.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.4%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 36.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,066 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (35.5%), Clark has a value of 36.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

Current Value:
31.8%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 31.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.8%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 31.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (33.6%), Clark has a value of 31.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Clark Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
64.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 64.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 52.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 62.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 64.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (63.0%), Clark has a value of 64.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(63.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Clark has a value of 64.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (64.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (62.0%).
Prior Value
(62.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Hypertension Prevalence

Current Value:

County: Clark Hypertension Prevalence

32.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (28.3%), Clark has a value of 32.4% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(28.3% in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (32.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (32.5%).
Prior Value
(32.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Hypertension: Medicare Population

Current Value:
62.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 62.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 57.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 59.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 62.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (60.0%), Clark has a value of 62.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Clark has a value of 62.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (62.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (62.0%).
Prior Value
(62.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
20.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 20.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 20.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (18.0%), Clark has a value of 20.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Clark has a value of 20.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (20.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.0%).
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Clark Stroke: Medicare Population

Current Value:
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (5.0%), Clark has a value of 6.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Clark has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.