Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Disparities Dashboard

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

dark blue chart bars Significantly different than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Clark

Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adults Who Are Overweight

Current Value:
36.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (36.0%), Clark has a value of 36.2% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(36.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (36.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (35.4%).
Prior Value
(35.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark

Health / Adolescent Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Adolescent Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Teens Who Have Ever Used Vaping Products

Current Value:
34.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (36.6%), Clark has a value of 34.3% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(36.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (34.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.5%).
Prior Value
(40.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

21.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 21.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (22.4), Clark has a value of 21.6 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(22.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (23.5), Clark has a value of 21.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (21.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.3).
Prior Value
(23.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Alcohol Use

8.5
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 8.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.1.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 10 counties.
Compared to the NV Value (10.2), Clark has a value of 8.5 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(10.2)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Binge Drinking Prevalence

Current Value:
14.4%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (14.2%), Clark has a value of 14.4% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (14.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.6%).
Prior Value
(14.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Current Value:
25.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 25.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (25.9), Clark has a value of 25.0 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(25.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.2), Clark has a value of 25.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Brain Cancer

Current Value:
4.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (4.4), Clark has a value of 4.2 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(4.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.4), Clark has a value of 4.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (4.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.2).
Prior Value
(4.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer

Current Value:
21.9
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 21.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,755 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (21.8), Clark has a value of 21.9 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(21.8)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.6), Clark has a value of 21.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (21.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.3).
Prior Value
(22.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (15.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer

Current Value:
150.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 150.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 162.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 179.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,085 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (150.7), Clark has a value of 150.8 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(150.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (149.4), Clark has a value of 150.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(149.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (150.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (154.3).
Prior Value
(154.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cervical Cancer

Current Value:
2.5
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (2.4), Clark has a value of 2.5 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(2.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.2), Clark has a value of 2.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (2.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.8).
Prior Value
(2.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer

14.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 14.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,174 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (14.6), Clark has a value of 14.9 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(14.6)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.1), Clark has a value of 14.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (14.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.4).
Prior Value
(15.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Liver Cancer

Current Value:
6.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (6.7), Clark has a value of 6.9 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(6.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6), Clark has a value of 6.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (6.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.9).
Prior Value
(6.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer

Current Value:
36.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 36.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 42.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 50.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,752 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (34.9), Clark has a value of 36.0 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(34.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0), Clark has a value of 36.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (36.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (37.8).
Prior Value
(37.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Melanoma

Current Value:
2.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 2.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 585 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (2.2), Clark has a value of 2.0 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(2.2)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.1), Clark has a value of 2.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (2.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.2).
Prior Value
(2.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Oral Cancer

Current Value:
2.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 2.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 702 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (2.6), Clark has a value of 2.6.
NV Value
(2.6)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.5), Clark has a value of 2.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (2.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.4).
Prior Value
(2.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Pancreatic Cancer

10.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 10.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,864 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (10.5), Clark has a value of 10.3 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(10.5)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.1), Clark has a value of 10.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (10.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.4).
Prior Value
(10.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer

Current Value:
19.3
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 19.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,576 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (19.4), Clark has a value of 19.3 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(19.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.8), Clark has a value of 19.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (19.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.1).
Prior Value
(19.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Uterine Cancer

Current Value:
4.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (4.3), Clark has a value of 4.4 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(4.3)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.1), Clark has a value of 4.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (4.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.4).
Prior Value
(4.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark All Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
385.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 385.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 387.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 439.2.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 385.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 457.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 489.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,934 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (398.8), Clark has a value of 385.8 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(398.8)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (448.6), Clark has a value of 385.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(448.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (385.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (386.4).
Prior Value
(386.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Bladder Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
18.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 18.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,193 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (20.0), Clark has a value of 18.9 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(20.0)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.7), Clark has a value of 18.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(19.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (18.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.1).
Prior Value
(19.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Brain Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
6.2
Per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (6.5), Clark has a value of 6.2 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(6.5)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.5), Clark has a value of 6.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (6.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.1).
Prior Value
(6.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
111.1
Cases per 100,000 females
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 111.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 121.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 133.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,709 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (115.0), Clark has a value of 111.1 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(115.0)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (126.8), Clark has a value of 111.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(126.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (111.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (109.7).
Prior Value
(109.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 11.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (10.0%), Clark has a value of 11.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Clark has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
8.8
Cases per 100,000 females
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 8.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 744 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (9.1), Clark has a value of 8.8 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(9.1)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.7), Clark has a value of 8.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (8.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.9).
Prior Value
(8.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Cervical Cancer Screening Prevalence

Current Value:
74.4%
(2014)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (73.1%), Clark has a value of 74.4% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(73.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (74.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (71.8%).
Prior Value
(71.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Childhood Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
16.9
Cases per 100,000 population 0-19
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 16.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 587 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (17.9), Clark has a value of 16.9 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(17.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.5), Clark has a value of 16.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(17.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (16.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.2).
Prior Value
(16.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
36.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 36.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 41.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,640 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (35.6), Clark has a value of 36.1 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(35.6)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (38.0), Clark has a value of 36.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(38.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (36.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36.4).
Prior Value
(36.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Colorectal Cancer Screening Prevalence

Current Value:
61.7%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (64.3%), Clark has a value of 61.7% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(64.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (61.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (63.5%).
Prior Value
(63.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Liver and Bile Duct Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
7.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 7.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,427 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (7.1), Clark has a value of 7.0 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(7.1)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.6), Clark has a value of 7.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (7.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.9).
Prior Value
(6.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
51.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 51.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 66.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 76.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,706 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (51.9), Clark has a value of 51.1 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(51.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.3), Clark has a value of 51.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(57.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (51.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (52.6).
Prior Value
(52.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Mammography Screening Prevalence

Current Value:
72.7%
(2014)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (70.9%), Clark has a value of 72.7% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(70.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (72.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (75.3%).
Prior Value
(75.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Current Value:
34.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 34.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 32.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 24.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 34.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (38.0%), Clark has a value of 34.0% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(38.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Clark has a value of 34.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (34.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.0%).
Prior Value
(34.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Melanoma Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Clark Melanoma Incidence Rate

13.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 13.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.0.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,137 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (17.6), Clark has a value of 13.1 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(17.6)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.6), Clark has a value of 13.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(22.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (13.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.2).
Prior Value
(13.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Incidence Rate

Current Value:
14.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 14.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,110 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (15.4), Clark has a value of 14.9 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(15.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.1), Clark has a value of 14.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(19.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (14.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.8).
Prior Value
(14.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
10.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 10.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,859 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (10.9), Clark has a value of 10.1 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(10.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.9), Clark has a value of 10.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (10.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.0).
Prior Value
(10.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Ovarian Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
10.3
Cases per 100,000 females
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 10.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,019 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (10.5), Clark has a value of 10.3 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(10.5)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.7), Clark has a value of 10.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (10.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.3).
Prior Value
(10.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Pancreatic Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
11.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 11.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,864 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (12.0), Clark has a value of 11.8 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.1), Clark has a value of 11.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (11.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.8).
Prior Value
(11.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
79.9
Cases per 100,000 males
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 79.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 102.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 120.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,713 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (85.9), Clark has a value of 79.9 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(85.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (106.2), Clark has a value of 79.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(106.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (79.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (80.0).
Prior Value
(80.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Uterine Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
22.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2014-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (22.0), Clark has a value of 22.5 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(22.0)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.4), Clark has a value of 22.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(27.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (22.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.7).
Prior Value
(21.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adults 20+ with Diabetes

Current Value:

County: Clark Adults 20+ with Diabetes

9.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 9.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.7%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 9.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (9.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Adults Who Have Been Told They Have Prediabetes

17.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (15.6%), Clark has a value of 17.5% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (17.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.1%).
Prior Value
(14.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Adults Who Have Seen a Healthcare Provider for Diabetes

77.7%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (79.0%), Clark has a value of 77.7% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(79.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Adults Who Have Taken a Diabetes Management Class

48.9%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (49.4%), Clark has a value of 48.9% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Current Value:
21.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 21.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,937 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (22.2), Clark has a value of 21.7 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(22.2)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.6), Clark has a value of 21.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(22.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (21.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (19.3).
Prior Value
(19.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Diabetes

22.4
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 22.4 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.0.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 14 counties.
Compared to the NV Value (21.0), Clark has a value of 22.4 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(21.0)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Long-Term Complications of Diabetes

11.0
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 11.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.3.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 12 counties.
Compared to the NV Value (9.9), Clark has a value of 11.0 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(9.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Short-Term Complications of Diabetes

9.6
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 9.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 12 counties.
Compared to the NV Value (9.6), Clark has a value of 9.6.
NV Value
(9.6)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Uncontrolled Diabetes

1.3
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (1.1), Clark has a value of 1.3 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(1.1)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:
25.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 25.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (23.0%), Clark has a value of 25.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Clark has a value of 25.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (25.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.0%).
Prior Value
(25.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Children with a Disability

Current Value:
4.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (4.4%), Clark has a value of 4.3%.
NV Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Clark has a value of 4.3%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:
4.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (4.9%), Clark has a value of 4.8%.
NV Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Clark has a value of 4.8%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Persons with a Disability

Current Value:
12.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (12.9%), Clark has a value of 12.5%.
NV Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Clark has a value of 12.5%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
3.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (3.8%), Clark has a value of 3.4%.
NV Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Clark has a value of 3.4%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
2.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (2.5%), Clark has a value of 2.6%.
NV Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Clark has a value of 2.6%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
2.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (2.6%), Clark has a value of 2.5%.
NV Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Clark has a value of 2.5%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:
6.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (6.9%), Clark has a value of 6.8%.
NV Value
(6.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Clark has a value of 6.8%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark

Health / Family Planning

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Family Planning

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Birth Rate

Current Value:

County: Clark Birth Rate

12.2
Per 1,000 population
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (12.2) is less  than the previously measured value (12.7).
Prior Value
(12.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark General Fertility Rate

Current Value:

County: Clark General Fertility Rate

60.3
Per 1,000 women aged 15–44
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (60.3) is less  than the previously measured value (62.4).
Prior Value
(62.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adults Who Have Had A-one-C (A1C) Checked

Current Value:
75.7%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (79.3%), Clark has a value of 75.7% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(79.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Adults with Health Insurance

Current Value:
84.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 84.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (84.7%), Clark has a value of 84.0% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(84.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.7%), Clark has a value of 84.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (84.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (83.0%).
Prior Value
(83.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Children with Health Insurance

Current Value:
92.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 92.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 93.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (92.4%), Clark has a value of 92.2% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(92.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (94.9%), Clark has a value of 92.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(94.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (92.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (90.9%).
Prior Value
(90.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:
85.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 85.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.9%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 85.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (86.2%), Clark has a value of 85.6% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(86.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (85.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (86.2%).
Prior Value
(86.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
51.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (52.0%), Clark has a value of 51.0%.
NV Value
(52.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.8%), Clark has a value of 51.0%.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (51.0%) is greater  than the previously measured value (50.3%).
Prior Value
(50.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
26.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (25.5%), Clark has a value of 26.5%.
NV Value
(25.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8%), Clark has a value of 26.5%.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (26.5%) is less  than the previously measured value (26.7%).
Prior Value
(26.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

3,090.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 3,090.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,209.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2,703.0.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 3,090.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (2,788.0), Clark has a value of 3,090.0 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(2,788.0)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Clark has a value of 3,090.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (3,090.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3,030.0).
Prior Value
(3,030.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
91.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 91.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 91.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (91.1%), Clark has a value of 91.1%.
NV Value
(91.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Clark has a value of 91.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adults Taking Prescription Cholesterol Medicine

23.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (24.3%), Clark has a value of 23.9% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(24.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Adults Who Have Had a Heart Attack / Myocardial Infarction

3.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (3.8%), Clark has a value of 3.4% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (3.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.7%).
Prior Value
(4.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)

35.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 35.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 39.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,338 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (38.3), Clark has a value of 35.7 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(38.3)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (37.6), Clark has a value of 35.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(37.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (35.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (35.8).
Prior Value
(35.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease

98.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 98.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 98.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 121.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (104.9), Clark has a value of 98.0 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(104.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (90.2), Clark has a value of 98.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (98.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (102.8).
Prior Value
(102.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (71.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Failure

32.6
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 32.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.5.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 13 counties.
Compared to the NV Value (29.6), Clark has a value of 32.6 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(29.6)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Hypertension

5.9
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (5.4), Clark has a value of 5.9 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(5.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Current Value:
12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (12.0%), Clark has a value of 12.0%.
NV Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Clark has a value of 12.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (12.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Cholesterol Screening Prevalence

Current Value:
73.8%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (74.7%), Clark has a value of 73.8% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(74.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (73.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (74.1%).
Prior Value
(74.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Current Value:
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (9.0%), Clark has a value of 10.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Clark has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (10.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
64.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 64.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 52.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 62.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 64.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (63.0%), Clark has a value of 64.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(63.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Clark has a value of 64.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (64.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (62.0%).
Prior Value
(62.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Hypertension Prevalence

Current Value:

County: Clark Hypertension Prevalence

26.2%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (28.3%), Clark has a value of 26.2% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(28.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (26.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (32.1%).
Prior Value
(32.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Hypertension: Medicare Population

Current Value:
62.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 62.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 57.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 59.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 62.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (60.0%), Clark has a value of 62.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Clark has a value of 62.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (62.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (62.0%).
Prior Value
(62.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
20.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 20.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 20.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (18.0%), Clark has a value of 20.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Clark has a value of 20.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (20.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.0%).
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Stroke: Medicare Population

Current Value:
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (5.0%), Clark has a value of 6.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Clark has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adults 65+ Immunized for Influenza

Current Value:
55.7%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (54.3%), Clark has a value of 55.7% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(54.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (55.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (54.6%).
Prior Value
(54.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Adults 65+ Immunized for Pneumonia

Current Value:
68.8%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (70.1%), Clark has a value of 68.8% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(70.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (68.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (68.5%).
Prior Value
(68.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia

14.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 14.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,449 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (14.3), Clark has a value of 14.1 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(14.3)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.4), Clark has a value of 14.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (14.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (16.1).
Prior Value
(16.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Community Acquired Pneumonia

22.9
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 22.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 29.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.4.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 14 counties.
Compared to the NV Value (24.7), Clark has a value of 22.9 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(24.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Hepatitis

1.6
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (1.7), Clark has a value of 1.6 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Immunization-Preventable Pneumonia and Influenza

0.8
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (1.0), Clark has a value of 0.8 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(1.0)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
39.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 39.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 29.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 18.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 39.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (41.0%), Clark has a value of 39.0% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(41.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Clark has a value of 39.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (39.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (38.0%).
Prior Value
(38.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19

Current Value:
60.8%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 60.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 44.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.4%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 60.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 52.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (60.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (60.8%).
Prior Value
(60.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 4.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 2.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (7.0%), Clark has a value of 6.0% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Clark has a value of 6.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (6.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (4.0%).
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide

Current Value:
18.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 18.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,307 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (19.6), Clark has a value of 18.0 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(19.6)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.9), Clark has a value of 18.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (18.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.0).
Prior Value
(19.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Depression: Medicare Population

Current Value:
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 13.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (13.0%), Clark has a value of 13.0%.
NV Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Clark has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (13.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Prevalence of Adult Depression

Current Value:
16.6%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (16.6%), Clark has a value of 16.6%.
NV Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (16.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.6%).
Prior Value
(15.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Life Expectancy

Current Value:

County: Clark Life Expectancy

77.2
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 77.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.9.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 16 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 77.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (77.0), Clark has a value of 77.2 which is higher and better.
NV Value
(77.0)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (77.6), Clark has a value of 77.2 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Premature Death

Current Value:

County: Clark Premature Death

8,192.6
Years per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 8,192.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9,469.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11,769.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,886 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (8,316.9), Clark has a value of 8,192.6 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(8,316.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (7,971.5), Clark has a value of 8,192.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7,971.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adults Who Eat Fruit Less Than Once Per Day

Current Value:
37.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (41.9%), Clark has a value of 37.5% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(41.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (37.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (39.8%).
Prior Value
(39.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Adults Who Eat Vegetables Less than Once Per Day

22.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (24.1%), Clark has a value of 22.7% which is lower and worse.
NV Value
(24.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (22.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.1%).
Prior Value
(23.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Fruit Intake among Adults

Current Value:
40.2%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (36.9%), Clark has a value of 40.2% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(36.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (40.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36.5%).
Prior Value
(36.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Milk Intake among Adolescents

Current Value:
93.9%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (93.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (92.4%).
Prior Value
(92.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Sugary Drink Intake among Adolescents

Current Value:
13.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (14.0%), Clark has a value of 13.3% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (13.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.4%).
Prior Value
(11.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Vegetable Intake among Adults

Current Value:
19.5%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (19.2%), Clark has a value of 19.5% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(19.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (19.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.3%).
Prior Value
(22.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:
34.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (34.0%), Clark has a value of 34.1%.
NV Value
(34.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Clark has a value of 34.1%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
13.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (14.3%), Clark has a value of 13.8%.
NV Value
(14.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Clark has a value of 13.8%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
8.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (7.5%), Clark has a value of 8.0%.
NV Value
(7.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Clark has a value of 8.0%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
6.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (6.6%), Clark has a value of 6.8%.
NV Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Clark has a value of 6.8%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

13.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (12.9%), Clark has a value of 13.4%.
NV Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Clark has a value of 13.4%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease

27.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 27.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (24.7), Clark has a value of 27.3 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(24.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (31.0), Clark has a value of 27.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(31.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (27.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.2).
Prior Value
(25.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 5.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (5.0%), Clark has a value of 5.0%.
NV Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Clark has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Kidney Disease

Current Value:
8.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 8.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,416 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (8.8), Clark has a value of 8.0 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(8.8)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.8), Clark has a value of 8.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (8.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.1).
Prior Value
(8.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Dehydration

11.8
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 11.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.4.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 12 counties.
Compared to the NV Value (11.1), Clark has a value of 11.8 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(11.1)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Urinary Tract Infections

15.3
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 15.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.8.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 13 counties.
Compared to the NV Value (15.7), Clark has a value of 15.3 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(15.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
19.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 19.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 19.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (17.0%), Clark has a value of 19.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Clark has a value of 19.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (19.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.0%).
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Current Value:
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 10.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 10.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (10.0%), Clark has a value of 10.0%.
NV Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Clark has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (10.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

32.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 32.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 29.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.5%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 32.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (31.0%), Clark has a value of 32.0% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(31.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Clark has a value of 32.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (32.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (31.0%).
Prior Value
(31.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Sedentary Adults 20+

Current Value:

County: Clark Sedentary Adults 20+

24.2%
Percent %
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (24.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.0%).
Prior Value
(27.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms

Current Value:
15.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 15.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,083 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (15.9), Clark has a value of 15.1 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(15.9)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0), Clark has a value of 15.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (15.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.2).
Prior Value
(15.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries

44.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 44.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 72.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,454 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (48.7), Clark has a value of 44.3 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(48.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (51.6), Clark has a value of 44.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(51.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (44.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (42.6).
Prior Value
(42.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.2), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Mortality Rate due to Heat-Related Illness

5.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (5.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.0).
Prior Value
(4.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Rate of Emergency Department Visits due to Heat-Related Illness

3.2
ED visits per 10,000 population
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (3.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.1).
Prior Value
(3.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Seat Belt Use among Adults

Current Value:
90.0%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (89.3%), Clark has a value of 90.0% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(89.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (90.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (89.5%).
Prior Value
(89.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adult Asthma History

Current Value:

County: Clark Adult Asthma History

12.4%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (13.6%), Clark has a value of 12.4% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (12.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.4%).
Prior Value
(12.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Adults Who Currently Have Asthma

Current Value:
6.8%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (8.1%), Clark has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (6.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.1%).
Prior Value
(8.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases

44.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 44.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 50.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,518 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (47.1), Clark has a value of 44.7 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(47.1)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (38.1), Clark has a value of 44.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(38.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (44.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (46.7).
Prior Value
(46.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Adult Asthma

7.9
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 7.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.9.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 10 counties.
Compared to the NV Value (7.3), Clark has a value of 7.9 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(7.3)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Asthma

8.8
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 8.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 10 counties.
Compared to the NV Value (8.1), Clark has a value of 8.8 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(8.1)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to COPD

Current Value:
18.3
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 18+ years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 18.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.8.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 14 counties.
Compared to the NV Value (18.6), Clark has a value of 18.3 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(18.6)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Pediatric Asthma

11.3
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population under 18 years
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (10.4), Clark has a value of 11.3 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(10.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Asthma: Medicare Population

Current Value:
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (7.0%), Clark has a value of 7.0%.
NV Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Clark has a value of 7.0%.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark COPD: Medicare Population

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (11.0%), Clark has a value of 11.0%.
NV Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Clark has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Chlamydia Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Clark Chlamydia Incidence Rate

550.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 550.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 261.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 350.8.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 550.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 294.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 467.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (509.4), Clark has a value of 550.6 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(509.4)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (495.0), Clark has a value of 550.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(495.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (550.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (563.8).
Prior Value
(563.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Clark Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

129.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (113.0), Clark has a value of 129.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(113.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Clark (129.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (94.1).
Prior Value
(94.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark HIV Diagnosis Rate

Current Value:

County: Clark HIV Diagnosis Rate

20.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2014-2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (20.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.8).
Prior Value
(17.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Persons Living with HIV Rate

Current Value:
418.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2014-2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (418.4) is greater  than the previously measured value (374.0).
Prior Value
(374.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Syphilis Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Clark Syphilis Incidence Rate

11.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (6.4), Clark has a value of 11.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Clark (11.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.0).
Prior Value
(6.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adult Smoking Cessation

Current Value:

County: Clark Adult Smoking Cessation

42.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (42.3%), Clark has a value of 42.5% which is higher and better.
NV Value
(42.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (42.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (56.5%).
Prior Value
(56.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Adults Who Use Chewing Tobacco

Current Value:
0.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (1.2%), Clark has a value of 0.7% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (0.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.0%).
Prior Value
(1.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Adults Who Use E-Cigarettes or Other Vaping Products

6.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (7.0%), Clark has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Teens Who Currently Smoke Cigars

Current Value:
6.2%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (6.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.7%).
Prior Value
(5.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Teens Who Used an E-vape for Marijuana

Current Value:
15.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (16.0%), Clark has a value of 15.7% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Teens Who Used an E-vape for Nicotine

Current Value:
12.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (15.0%), Clark has a value of 12.5% which is lower and better.
NV Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Adults Who Are Obese

Current Value:

County: Clark Adults Who Are Obese

31.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (31.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (29.2%).
Prior Value
(29.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Obese Adolescents

Current Value:

County: Clark Obese Adolescents

16.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (16.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Overweight Adolescents

Current Value:

County: Clark Overweight Adolescents

17.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (17.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.9%).
Prior Value
(15.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide

Current Value:
7.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 7.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 495 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (6.8), Clark has a value of 7.4 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(6.8)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6), Clark has a value of 7.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (7.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.7).
Prior Value
(7.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.5), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
<div>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Juvenile Arrests

Current Value:

County: Clark Juvenile Arrests

6,989
Arrests
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Clark (6,989) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5,452).
Prior Value
(5,452)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

County: Clark Foreign Born Persons

21.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (19.1%), Clark has a value of 21.8%.
NV Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Clark has a value of 21.8%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Veteran Population

Current Value:

County: Clark Veteran Population

8.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the NV Value (8.5%), Clark has a value of 8.1%.
NV Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Clark has a value of 8.1%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions

9.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 9.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,266 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (10.3), Clark has a value of 9.0 which is lower and better.
NV Value
(10.3)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.4), Clark has a value of 9.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Clark (9.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.3).
Prior Value
(9.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Clark Households without a Vehicle

Current Value:
7.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 7.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.2%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 7.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (7.1%), Clark has a value of 7.7% which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Clark has a value of 7.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

County: Clark Mean Travel Time to Work

25.1
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 25.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.2.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 25.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (24.7), Clark has a value of 25.1 which is higher and worse.
NV Value
(24.7)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Clark has a value of 25.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Clark Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
2.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to NV Counties, Clark has a value of 2.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 1.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.3%.
NV Counties
The distribution is based on data from 17 locales.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Clark has a value of 2.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the NV Value (2.5%), Clark has a value of 2.5%.
NV Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Nevada State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Clark has a value of 2.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Clark value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV